So I’ve read that long Los Angeles Times piece on the Geffen-Clinton split. Not only did the local paper get badly burned by The New York Times on this weeks ago, but there’s little new in today’s catch-up article. So Bill’s White House thought of David as “high-maintenance”. Gee, a big campaign donor who expects the candidate to listen to him: will wonders never cease? The sheer naïveté of this article amazes me.
LAT Is Late & Lite On Geffen-Clinton Split
What's Hot on Deadline
'Halloween' Poised To Topple 'Venom's $80M+ October Opening Record; Best Debut For Blumhouse & John Carpenter Canon