New York law will take precedence over Californa’s in Melrose 2 financiers’ lawsuit against Paramount Pictures and DW Studios, Judge Michael Linfield has ruled. Because New York law doesn’t recognize redundant claims on matters based on the same evidence, Judge Linfield dismissed Melrose 2’s claims under California law of breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing as well as unfair completion. “These allegations are no different than the allegations underlying plaintiff’s breach of contract claim and plaintiff has alleged that each of these duties are contractual obligations governed by the agreement,” Linfield wrote in his ruling. Linfield gave the Melrose 2 investors 20 days after a July 19 hearing to amend and resubmit their claim of fraud in the case. Melrose 2 filed suit in November 2011 seeking to recover profits from its nearly $375 million investment in 29 films produced by Paramount and DW Studios, formerly known as DreamWorks and then part of Paramount. The movies include Mission Impossible 3, Charlotte’s Web, Dreamgirls, Flags of Our Fathers and all three Transformers films, among others.
Melrose 2 Suit Vs. Paramount Trimmed
What's Hot on Deadline
'Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice': 2 New TV Spots Promote Gotham City, Metropolis & Turkish Airlines
Latest Film News
- Producer Marc Platt On Oscars’ Diversity, ‘Bridge Of Spies’ & Making ‘Grease’ Live
- Feds Probing ‘Wolf Of Wall Street’ Producer Red Granite’s Money Relationships
- Bart & Fleming: Ava DuVernay In Demand; CEO Mischief And Focus Feature Casualties; ‘Spotlight’s Lingering Legacy
- J.K. Simmons & Julie Delpy To Star In ‘The Bachelors’ From ‘Unbroken,’ ‘Descendants…
- ‘Mike & Dave Need Wedding Dates’ Trailer: Can Efron & Devine Out-Party Kendrick & Plaza?
- Morgan Freeman To Receive Chaplin Award From Film Society Of Lincoln Center