A Senate Judiciary subcommittee on Tuesday debated whether Congress could force the Supreme Court to allow cameras to broadcast arguments live — or whether it even should. The sticking point, of course, is that whole separation of powers thing. As it is, Supreme Court arguments are released as transcripts and audio recordings after the justices hear cases; live TV or audio is not allowed. The topic is garnering renewed interest this election cycle thanks to the Court preparing to hear arguments about the constitutionality of President Obama’s health care law, which is sure to be a major talking point in the upcoming presidential elections. The Senate Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and the Courts heard testimony from witnesses including former Sen. Arlen Specter, who said that like for the House of Representatives beginning in 1979 and the Senate in 1986, C-SPAN “stands ready, willing and anxious to televise Supreme Court proceedings.”
Senate Panel Ponders Supreme Court TV; Specter Says C-SPAN “Ready, Willing”
Trending Now on Deadline
More From Team
- 'Madam Secretary' Coming To U.K. On Sky Living; NBCUniversal International Television Production Pacts With TV3 Group Ireland…
- 'High Profits': New CNN Series Profiles Colorado Pot Business Owners
- Mary McCormack & Alicia Witt Join 'House Of Lies'; Lindsey Gort In 'Self Promotion'
- Courtney Love To Guest Star In Fox's 'Empire'
- 'Good Morning America' Ratings Lead Morning Infotainment Race
- Zachary Booth, Bill Irwin, Six More Round Out 'South Of Hell' Cast On WE TV