EMMYS: Movies & Miniseries Race Is On

EMMYS: Why Movies & Mini-Series Combined

Now that the movie and mini-series categories have been combined by the TV Academy, it’s interesting that in this first year of the new configuration voters predictably favored the more expensive and elaborate mini-series format with 4 of the 6 nominations. One reason for the change in the first place was because of the perceived paucity in the numbers of minis eligible, so go figure. Actually among those contenders that didn’t make the cut I would argue that perhaps two other minis got robbed: Sundance Channel’s Carlos which was the darling of every film festival it entered beginning with Cannes. And BBC America’s Luther also deserved a spot but its grim subject matter focusing on a brilliant detective who takes a walk on the dark side may have turned off those who preferred the sleaze factor of Reelz Channel’s The Kennedys instead.

But what about those that did get the nod?  Here’s the handicapping.

This made-for-HBO movie told the story of the Loud Family who lived their dysfunctional lives in front of a documentary film crew thus becoming the template for today’s multitude of reality TV programs. The film received mixed reviews and isn’t generally considered HBO’s finest hour but Diane Lane shone brightly in it and lifted the material, deservedly getting a Best Actress Emmy nomination. Considering the advance age of many voters, the memory of the real Loud family and their TV meltdown may be too vivid for any narrative  film to overcome. Still its 9 overall nominations including Directing for Shari Springer Berman and Robert Pulcini are impressive although the lack of a writing nod isn’t a good omen. This one is a real long shot to battle the mini-series tide in the category and may just wind up a bridesmaid this season.

This stunning mini-series from Masterpiece Theatre is a period pre-WWI drama centering on the conflicts surrounding the Crawley family and their servants. British dramas are often showered with Emmy love and this is no exception garnering 11 nominations overall including writing, directing, and acting nods for Elizabeth McGovern and Maggie Smith. There is no giant mini like John Adams, Band of Brothers, or The Pacific to stomp all over it despite HBO rival Mildred Pierce’s whopping 21 nominations. A great script from Oscar winner Julian Fellowes (Gosford Park), a magnificent cast that also includes Hugh Bonneville, and fine production values made critics swoon. This is the one to watch coming up to the front from the outside. A second season is already planned for fans who just couldn’t get enough.

THE KENNEDYS (Reelz Channel)
This $25 million 6-hour mini widely derided as “playing with the facts” was jettisoned by the History Channel which originally commissioned it and finally found a home on the little-seen Reelz Channel. I thought Emmy voters might turn their backs on it, too, but an outsized 10 nominations proved me wrong. Never overestimate the tastes of Emmy voters as those nominations put it in the game, likely at the expense of the far superior Carlos and Luther. Stars Greg Kinnear, Barry Pepper, and Tom Wilkinson reeled in Emmy nods as well but there was no love for the mini in writing and directing categories. Not a good sign. Reelz did send a 3-DVD set of the show to all Academy members but it would likely only have a fighting chance in a weaker year – and this is NOT a weak year. This is the longest of shots. It should just be content to get an invite to the party.

Perennial winner HBO’s big mini this season was this 5-part remake of Mildred Pierce, the 1945 noir from James M. Cain’s book that won Joan Crawford her Best Actress Oscar. It is likely it will do the same Emmy-wise for star Kate Winslet who runs with the role that pays closer attention to the original novel. Pierce itself faces fierce competition for the crown in this category because at its heart it is just a soap and the overlong adaptation exposes some of its flaws. But you cannot ignore the fact that it is leading all comers in this year’s Emmy race with 21 nominations, a total bloated by 6 acting bids. Just based on those raw numbers it would seem to have wide support across the Academy. Reviews weren’t over the moon and ratings were less than expected, but director Todd Haynes gave it verve and style and that may be enough to carry the day. But this is no slam dunk even if its closest rivals (Downton Abbey and Too Big To Fail) received barely more than half of Ms. Pierce’s haul.

An “epic” 8-part mini-series attempt to give Starz some instant Emmy cred based on Ken Follett’s bestseller. A sterling cast led by Ian McShane helped to turn this old-fashioned mini into a contender for Academy voters who fondly remember when this sort of big-scale was catnip for the broadcast networks. Although those voters awarded it 7 nominations, that’s the smallest total in the category and includes no mention of acting, writing, or directing. For Chris Albrecht who was used to all that Emmy glory when he was at HBO, Pillars reps a small stepping stone back into Emmy’s golden circle and managing to land one of the prized slots in this very competitive year is victory enough for the Starz.

This riveting drama based on the non-fiction book of the same name by New York Times financial journalist Andrew Ross Sorkinis is the most current and contemporary of the nominees. Playing Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson is Emmy-nominated William Hurt who turns in one of his best performances in years. But the whole cast shines including Billy Crudup, Topher Grace, Cynthia Nixon, James Woods, and Paul Giamatti. Oscar winner Curtis Hanson directed and would have taken the Movie category this year had it still existed on its own (particularly with 11 noms). But alas Too Big To Fail is probably now too small to win in the combined category against much stiffer competition.

  1. Surely Downtown Abbey is a 99% chance like The Daily Show or The Amazing Race. Same probably for Maggie Smith.

    1. Unfortunately I’ve seen GoldDerby and some betting places give the edge to Evan Rachel Wood over Maggie Smith recently, reversing their initial positions. I thought Smith had the best chances out of all the Downton Abbey nominees (and would have accepted her award as a symbolic win for the show), so it’s dispiriting to see them diminish as we get closer to the ceremony.

  2. It’s ludicrous that Katey Holmes wasn’t nominated for playing Jackie. Her acting was sublime and the best performance in the miniseries.

    1. I agree about Katie Holmes. This was by far a much superior performance than anything in her past. Joey Potter was more or less non-existant in this film.

    2. Are you kidding? NONE of those actors acted. Barry, Greg, Katie – they all looked like they were in the contest of Kennedy impersonators. They tried so much to mimic every piece of Kennedy’s that in the end they looked ridiculous.

      Greg was worst of them all. His John Kennedy just looked like he is mentally ill idiot. I looked at him and was like: “Is this legendary John Kennedy? Really? How that slow idiot even become become president”.

      That was not John Kennedy I watched in archive video and pictures.

  3. Everything I’ve seen her in has been some variation of her character on Dawson’s Creek. She has limited range. I haven’t seen The Kennedys, though, so I’ll have to take your word for it.

  4. I don’t want to think it, but it’s glaring me right in the face. Carlos and Luther have minorities playing in the main roles and while I don’t want to believe Hollywood to be racist, what with the possibility of Tyler Perry TV (just threw-up in my mouth), that belief is sitting with me. Sure, you can argue their dark and grim subject matter, but isn’t The Kennedys about tragedy? I didn’t see The Kennedys, so maybe it was about all of their “happy” years.

  5. LUTHER was brilliant stuff! Idris Elba deserves to win best actor Emmy, unless the weak stomached voters will be turned off by its brilliant epic grittiness. He truly shined and the storylines were fresh and compelling! cant wait for its return

  6. I don’t think “The Kennedys” deserved the nominations that it received. However, Greg Kinear’s JFK was impressive. Katie Holmes Jackie wasn’t bad but “wasn’t bad” isn’t emmy worthy. The series sensationalized and exploited every shame-filled detail of the real Kennedys’ lives, leaving no dark corners that the series didn’t crawl into.

    Joe Kennedy wasn’t a saint by any means but the character in the series is an over-the-top manipulating, evil egotist who’d screw anyone (not just Gloria Swanson) to make a buck, promote himself, and his sons (in that order.)

    1. Well, everything I’ve read about old Joe paints him pretty black (and blue). Didn’t see the production in question, but your description of their portrayal of him sounds like they got his spectacular gift for ruthlessness about right..lol.

  7. I was quite shocked to find out Mildred Pierce was nominated, period. Actually, no I wasn’t. I hated Mildred Pierce, it was boring and sophomoric without an ounce of nuance or subtlety. It was like watching sanitation spray down girlie puke on Bourbon Street at 5am. And everything I hate usually gets a jillion awards. Maybe that’s why I’m out of touch and work in the post office.

    1. Yeah, but sounds like it’s a post office in New Orleans, which explains a lot. You ARE “out of touch”…but that’s a good thing!

Comments are closed.