dga.jpgThis updates what I reported last night, DGA Negotiators Talk About Their Plans: “Because we want to give the WGA and the AMPTP more time to return to the negotiating table to conclude an agreement, the DGA will not schedule our negotiations to begin until after the New Year, and then, apted-cates.JPGonly if an appropriate basis for negotiations can be established. If that’s the case, then the DGA will commence formal talks in the hope that a fresh perspective and the additional pressure we can bring to bear will help force the AMPTP to settle the issues before us in a fair and reasonable manner. ” The AMPTP responded that “This will still be an extremely difficult process. All of us need to get this right.”

Here are this morning’s DGA statements in their entirety:

Negotiations Announcement from DGA President Michael Apted and Negotiations Committee Chair Gil Cates (December 13, 2007)

Although the DGA has a long history of early negotiations, this year we held off starting our own formal talks with the AMPTP for two months out of respect for our sister guild. Instead, we watched the writers’ negotiations closely while preparing for our turn at bat. We are deeply disappointed by the breakdown of talks between the WGA and the AMPTP with no end to the strike in sight. Like everyone else in the industry, we had hoped that the two parties would be able to reach a fair and reasonable deal that adequately compensates talent for the work they create.

But now the situation is dire. The WGA-AMPTP impasse has cost the jobs of tens of thousands of entertainment-industry workers, including many of our own members, and more lose their jobs every day the strike continues. With so much at stake and no end to the standoff in sight, we can no longer abdicate our responsibility to our own members. Because we want to give the WGA and the AMPTP more time to return to the negotiating table to conclude an agreement, the DGA will not schedule our negotiations to begin until after the New Year, and then, only if an appropriate basis for negotiations can be established. If that’s the case, then the DGA will commence formal talks in the hope that a fresh perspective and the additional pressure we can bring to bear will help force the AMPTP to settle the issues before us in a fair and reasonable manner.

Negotiations Update From DGA President Michael Apted (December 13, 2007)
Dear Members,
As you know, the negotiations between the Writers Guild and the AMPTP once again broke down last week and the strike has continued. All along, it has been the sincere hope of the DGA that these talks would be successful and lead to a fair deal for talent. We are sorry this has not been the case.

With the current work stoppage now in its sixth week, we know the situation has become grave—and is getting worse with each passing day. Already, a number of feature films have been cancelled or postponed, and we are now perilously close to losing both the 2007-2008 television season and the 2008 pilot season—a loss that would have a devastating effect not only on DGA members but on the industry as a whole.

The DGA has always believed that the most effective way to start the process of negotiating is to begin that process early. That belief—proven by experience—has guided us through the last 20 years of negotiations. This year has been different. Out of respect for the WGA, we held off for months in order to give the writers a chance to make a deal. We also refrained from commenting publicly about the nature of their proposals and the progress of their negotiations. At the same time, while we didn’t proceed with our negotiations, we did not stop our own preparations which began in earnest in 2006. During that time we put considerable DGA time and financial resources into hiring the best outside consultants and experts in new media, the future of technology, and business analysis. Over this time, they have made a number of presentations to the DGA Leadership and the National Board, all the while continuing to analyze and refine the data with DGA staff. Our 50-member Negotiations Committee has also continued to meet regularly with our staff and these outside consultants to discuss and refine our priorities and proposals.

In short, we have been waiting and watching for months. But now, with no end to the current impasse in sight, we find ourselves having to ask the hard question: is it now our turn to sit across from the AMPTP? We believe the answer to that question lies in one simple truth. We cannot abdicate our responsibility to all of you, the DGA membership. You expect us to fight for you. We promised you we would do just that. We believe that the preparation and determination DGA traditionally brings to the table, combined with our fresh perspective, is what is needed to get the job done. The issue is not between the DGA and the WGA. Those who want to make that the fight only strengthen our true adversaries. The real issue is how to ensure that we get the best and most equitable deal for DGA members. With this first and foremost in our minds, we have decided that the DGA must go forward with our own negotiations.

In order to give the WGA and the AMPTP one last chance to get back to the table, we will not schedule our negotiations to begin until after the New Year, and then only if an appropriate basis for negotiations can be established. If it can, then the DGA will commence formal talks with the AMPTP in the hope that our bargaining strength and fresh perspective can help achieve a good and fair outcome for all concerned.
Sincerely,
Michael Apted
DGA President

Not long after, the AMPTP issued the following statement:

We look forward to talking with the Directors Guild of America in an atmosphere of professionalism and respect. But no one should be under any illusions: this will still be an extremely difficult process. All of us – producers, directors, writers and everyone working in the entertainment business – need to get this right, because in the rapidly evolving new media marketplace, there is little margin for error. We must work in partnership to create a modern
economic system that fairly shares the benefits of progress while providing opportunity for the kind of innovation and flexibility we all need to succeed.